Connect with us

Culture

The Hill Refuses To Accept That Most Americans Want To “Conserve” Civil Liberities

Populist Media

Published

on

Wednesday, The Hill published an illogical review of how Americans feel about “Originalism” or to be more precise, their Civil Liberties as drawn out in our founding documents, the Declaration of Independence,  US Bill of Rights, US Constitution.

According to the dictionary, Civil Liberties is defined as: “The state of being subject only to laws established for the good of the community, especially with regard to freedom of action and speech.

  • individual rights protected by law from unjust governmental or other interference.”

    But what is “unjust” government to a Communist?

The Hill reports,” President Trump is nominating federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices such as Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who claim to be committed to “originalism.” This approach to constitutional law requires that the Constitution be interpreted to mean today what the text was intended or understood to mean at the time it was written. But originalism conflicts sharply with American reality and American ideals.

Years ago, Frank Sinatra sang a song about what America meant to him. The last line was “But especially the people, that’s America to me.” If that’s what America is, then originalism is unamerican.  Because there is no place for the over 300 million Americans today in originalist interpretations of constitutional law. We just don’t count.”

The Hill says that there is no room for “The People” in the Trump agenda of restoring jobs and political power back to the people.   Interesting.

Let’s deconstruct that.

Does this sound foreign to Americans today?  We want the government to get off our backs, stop overtaxing us,  stop over regulating our business, allow us the right to our own property, our own thoughts, and our own finances.  We want the government to not amass power against us to take the things we have earned.

The Hill implies that is old-fashioned and actually “at war” with our country and fellow citizens.

A REALIST WHO WON’T ACCEPT REALITY

The Declaration of Independence lays it out.

CENSORSHIP OF CONSERVATIVES ON ALL SOCIAL MEDIA OUTLETS

The people wanted the government to abide by the laws that they set for civility in their communities. The people wanted to protect their own representation in making those laws because the government had decided large groups of people were not allowed to be considered worthy to be treated fairly.

IRS ATTACKS CONSERVATIVES

The government had attacked groups of people who had organized to protect their rights thru legal means.

DACA AND OTHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL IMMIGRATION

The government had provided large groups of immigrants free access to the country, in hopes of marganilizng the legal inhabitants.

LAWFARE

The government was messing with the people’s choices of judges.

DOJ, FBI, CIA

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

The government had empowed gangs to harass and disturb people’s peace.

BAD TRADE DEALS, CORRUPT AND MASSIVE MONEY DEALS

Cut off the ability for them to profit from their work or their goods. Overtaxed them. Let the elite off with murder, ignored their written directives on how they should be treated.

CORRUPT MEDIA

Had public trials by gossip, and not legal trials by Jury. The Government had stolen from them and ruined their lives.

ANTIFA

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

INVALIDATING ELECTIONS

Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.

Even with the mythology that Hillary won the “popular vote” made up of what everyone knows was massive fraud and historic illegal votes, President Donald J. Trump won 2016 in a massive victory.

What organization like The Hill don’t understand is that for people who do not want the government to control our life, liberty pursuit of happiness… we have been here before.

Although the left refuses to acknowledge the peaceful transfer of power to the People’s president, that does not mean that the people’s wishes and hopes have change.  The Constitution is a timeless list of demands by humans who long to live without the pressure of pleasing the government.

That starts with the Demand that we are independent of such demands.  Much like a man wishes to be independent of a nagging wife.

The Declaration of Independence, which officially broke all political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain, set forth the ideas and principles behind a just and fair government, and the Constitution outlined how this government would function.

WATCH:

WATCH:

WATCH:

 

LAWFARE

Perhaps it is the powers to organize behind law that is at war with America? Because isn’t that a convenient way to receive the bounty of a land rich with natural resources with all the benefits of winning a long war, without shooting off one gun?

Because Conservatives still want to conserve Civil Liberties:

 

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Democrat Media Attacks

Trump Shows His Support For Nick Sandmann After Filing A Lawsuit Against The Washington Post

Yvette Munoz

Published

on

On Tuesday, Nick Sandmann launched his first lawsuit against the Washington Post for defamation after he was “vilified” by the paper when the left wing Native-American activist Nathan Philips beat a drum inches away from his face at a pro-life march. The Washington Post failed to retract and apologize to Sandmann including after the truth of the matter surfaced the web. A total of $250 million is the amount that the lawyers are asking on behalf of Sandmann after 6 different defamatory articles were published by the Post.

 

President Trump, who is well known for calling out the fake news media, decide to post a tweet in support of Nick Sandmann this Wednesday morning.

“The Washington Post ignored basic journalistic standards because it wanted to advance its well-known and easily documented biased agenda against President Donald J. Trump.” Covington student suing WAPO. Go get them Nick. Fake News!”

Prior to his tweet in support of Sandmann, The President once exposed the propaganda machine that the mainstream media has become. After continuous lies from the major corporate news networks, their agenda to report anything for the soul purpose of making money has never been more clear than it is today.

“The Press has never been more dishonest than it is today. Stories are written that have absolutely no basis in fact. The writers don’t even call asking for verification. They are totally out of control. Sadly, I kept many of them in business. In six years, they all go BUST!” said the President.

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Democrat Media Attacks

Nick Sandmann Sues The Washington Post For The Amount Of $250 Million

Yvette Munoz

Published

on

Nick Sandmann is taking a big step forwards in suing the first bully from his long list for defamation. The Washington Post are being sued for repeatedly attacking Nick Sandmann for wearing a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat at a por-life march when Native American Nathan Philips begin harassing the underage teens from the Covignton Catholic High School. The Washington Post indeed correct their second article written on the incident that occurred in late January of 2019, except the only thing they retracted was for wrongfully stating that Nathan Philips was a Vietnam war veteran, but they demonizing description on the minors in MAGA hats remain.

The lawsuit states the attacks and smear campaigns from the Post towards Sandmann was a form of MacCarthyism and character assassination.

“The Post published to third parties without privilege no less than six false and defamatory articles of and concerning Nicholas, including two in its print newspaper and four online.”

Like taking down Goliath, the lawsuit also indicates that this is a fight against the bullying behavior of the Washington Post: “The Post must be dealt with the same way every bully is dealt with and that is hold the bully fully accountable for its wrongdoing in a manner which effectively deters the bully from again bullying other children. In a civil lawsuit, punishment and deterrence is found in awarding money damages to the victim and target of the bully.”

The Post will be sued for the amount of $250 million. The meaning behind the amount requested is the total purchase price that Bezos (owner of the Post) paid when he bought it in 2013. At least more than 50 media, dioceses, and celebrities, Representative Ilhan Omar, and Nathan Philips who received notice of possible litigation. Neither of these people and media outlets issued an apology and will be facing charges for defamation against the Covington Catholic High School boys.

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Violent Left

Underage Teen Boy Verbally Attacked For Wearing ‘MAGA’ Hat By Store Employee

Yvette Munoz

Published

on

On Saturday, a 14-year-old boy was verbally attacked by a male employee while he was shopping at a Vans store. The incident took place at Oak Park Mall in Overland Park, Kansas when the underage teen was wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and one of the employees told the teen to take off the hat. The teen refused to take off the hat, which then led the employee to tell him “F*ck you.”

The mother of the teenage boy confronted the man who had verbally abused her son demanding an explanation, “He did nothing to you. What did you say to my son, my 14-year-old son?” The employee responded, “I said ‘F*ck you.'”

The mother then demanded to speak to the manager when another gentlemen behind the counter told the her, “I’m sorry guys, just go about your business,” but the mother was not having it. “Absolutely not. I want corporate office, I want everything right now,” the mother demanded all the information required to report the disrespectful employee to corporate regarding the incident.

The employee who cussed out the teenage boy has been fired soon after the mother of the teen complained to corporate. “Our focus is to provide the best customer service experience. We did let this employee go. He is no longer with our company. The actions and comments from this employee at the Oak Park location is in contrast with our values and beliefs,” said Vans corporate office, according to a statement obtained by the Daily Caller.

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Trending