Connect with us

US Supreme Court

Kim Strassel Chisels Away At Ford’s Case, Exposes Conspirarcy With Media

Populist Media

Published

on

Sunday, the allegations pimped out by the Democrats and the Media about Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations of sexual assault by Judge Brett Kavanaugh, in hopes of resisting President Donald J. Trump’s nomination to the Supreme Court, is taking serious blows today, showing a conspiracy between the media and the Democrats- again.

“Wow. “Before her name became public, Ford told…” That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford’s response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer,” tweeted Kimberley Strassel, journalist.

FORDS’S BEST FRIEND BACKTRACKS SATURDAY NIGHT:

SUNDAY EARLY MORNING, THERE IS MORE TO SHOW WAPO HANDLING WAS CORRUPT

Click on the link and follow the thread:

EASIER TO READ

Read Thread UnRolled

Here, Strassel shows that there is a collusion between the media and the Democrat Party, to destory Kavanaugh by any means necessary.  The WaPo, claims Strassel, ran with a story they knew would be discredited.

“In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: “Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware.” wrote Strassel.

CONSPIRARCY

Remember, “collusion” is not a crime- but Conspirarcy is a crime.

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 701Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994108 Stat. 2147.)

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Government

US Supreme Court Approves Trump’s Ban On Transgenders In The Military

Yvette Munoz

Published

on

In July of 2017, President Trump first tweeted a statement announcing he was moving forward with a ban on transgenders  from joining the military after consulting with Generals and military experts.  The President stated that transgender troops would no longer be allowed to serve in the military due to the lack of focus under overwhelming situations. He also added that treatment for transgenders are a financial burden due the “tremendous” cost of medications. President Trump reversed this policy after one year of effectiveness which was approved under the previous administration.

 

Secretary of Defense James Mattis released a written statement to the President on February 22, 2018, with concerns about the transgenders who have a mental disorder called Gender Dysphoria. After gathering the data from civil and military medical professionals, including own Penal data, who focus on treating such mental disorder, the Department of Defense (Pentagon) concluded that individuals with Gender Dysphoria are incapable of serving in the military for a number reasons such as mental instability to operate under overwhelming circumstance, high cost of medical expenses, and the time required to be off duty to recover after treatment (36 months). The Department of Defense affirmed that mental health stability is a requirement for all of their service members, including those who are not transgender.

On January 22nd, 2019, the 9th Circuit Supreme Court approved the ban on transgenders from serving in the military. Although the LGBT community fought against the ban, today it will go into effect. With the suicide and depression rate in the transgender community exceeding 42%, according to a 2014 report from The Williams Institute, the military refused to proceed to risk other military members under crucial circumstances. Four out of nine Justices objected the ban, however, the Supreme Court will allow the ban to go forward as lower courts fight to block it.

The Pentagon has always applied specific requirements to be part of the military as General Mattis clarifies below:

“By its very nature, military service requires sacrifice. The men and women who serve
voluntarily accept limitations on their personal liberties – freedom of speech, political activity,
freedom of movement – in order to provide the military lethality and readiness necessary to
ensure American citizens enjoy their personal freedoms to the fullest extent. Further, personal
characteristics, including age, mental acuity, and physical fitness – among others- matter to
field a lethal and ready force.”

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

US Supreme Court

SCOTUS: Voter ID OK in North Dakota, Hedi Heitkamp Sad

Populist Media

Published

on

Tuesday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a ruling that would clear the way for Voter ID in the upcoming November 2018 midterm races, effecting Senator Heidi Heitkamp.

“Justice Kavanaugh did not participate. Also, as I’ve noted before, justices do not need to state their votes in applications like this. As such, all that we know is that a majority voted against vacating the stay, and that 2 of the 8 justices participating noted their dissent,” reported Chris Geidner.

SOUR GRAPES:

“ND GOP wrote voter ID law after Heitkamp won her Senate election by 3,000 votes with strong Native support. Tribal IDs, which use PO Boxes for addresses, are not valid IDs under the law, “a specification that seems designed to disenfranchise Native voters,” said the Democrat party.

At issue are North Dakota voters who do not have residences or valid IDs to establish residency and legal status.

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

US Supreme Court

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh Has Been Sworn In, Begins Work Immediately

Populist Media

Published

on

Saturday, Justice Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed and sworn in as the 114th US Supreme Court Justice, in Washington DC, providing President Donald J. Trump with an unprecedented victory streak with Conservative Judges and two Conservative Justices.

According to SCOTUS Blog,

“The Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh will be sworn in as the 102nd Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on October 6, 2018. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., will administer the Constitutional Oath and retired Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy will administer the Judicial Oath in a private ceremony later today in the Justices’ Conference Room at the Supreme Court. Both oaths will be administered so that he can begin to participate in the work of the Court immediately.

A formal investiture ceremony will take place at a special sitting of the Court in the Courtroom at a later date.”

Read Full Press Release

According to the AP, Brett Kavanaugh was sworn in at a private ceremony Saturday evening by Chief Justice John Roberts.

Begins work immediately.

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Trending