Connect with us

Lawfare

Roger Stone Passes Two Polygraphs Exams-Mueller Has Nothing

Published

on

Monday, ABC News reported that longtime friend of President Donald J. Trump, who has been the victim of illegal leaks by the Special Counsel’s office about his Conservative/Libertarian activism, had passed two polygraph exams regarding his involvement in Trump’s 2016 Presidential Campaign and alleged “collusion” with Russians.

“Stone’s legal team tells ABC News that last month their client voluntarily took two polygraph tests, which they claim will show Stone passing with flying colors on a spectrum of key issues covering areas of interest in the Mueller probe related to Stone.

The two polygraph tests, paid for by Stone’s legal team, were administered by Slattery Associates Inc. in Florida. Stone’s legal team shared the results from the tests exclusively with ABC News for review. However, ABC News cannot independently verify the results of the tests,” reported ABC News.

Read Full Article 

MUELLER’S OBSESSION WITH STONE

Of course, the Leftist Media will blow that off  the defense of Stone as irrelevant:

Guilty because a Leftist says so:

Leaks and Public Trials in the Media:

Lawfare is unAmerican:

Developing…

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Lawfare

Exclusive: Wall Street Journal Frames Roger Stone

Published

on

In a public trial in the media, where journalists are acting as judge and jury for conservative activists and conservative political pundits, the Wall Street Journal has admitted they break the law by printing leaks from a taxpayer-funded government office with unlimited resources, and they like making money on denying an American his civil liberties.

In an exchange with Shelby Holliday of the Wall Street Journal, Roger Stone said,”This has been reported on so many times, I can’t believe the WSJ have any interest in rehashing it again.”

The media’s current political target: Stone, a longtime friend of President Donald J. Trump, and Conservative/ Libertarian political icon.

THAT IS CALLED A “LEAK”

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter,” reported Shelby Holliday, in the Wall Street Journal on Oct.19, 2018.

Read Full Article 

Their next target:  Could be you.

Have you volunteered for a candidate or campaign?  Are you a member of the GOP?  Have you started a media company or blog?  Have you posted about your political choices on social media?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you should care about this story.

DEAR POLITICAL PUNDITS AND ACTIVISTS

Imagine a world where you get an email from the Wall Street Journal framing you with treason, claiming they have proof of your criminal collision because they heard from the Top Cop in the land that you are basically guilty and they are going to publish the story to the world, after months of targeted harassment against you and your family.

Scared enough to stay out of politics yet?

Do you know who would be brave enough to print your side of that story, and stare down the monolith of the Leftist Mainstream Media in your defense, and in defense of American Civil Liberties?

Populist Media is here for you, just remember.

TIMELINE- FOR THE RECORD- ACCORDING TO ROGER STONE:

According to Stone the following is his rebuttal to the constant Leaks to the Media and their coordinated drumbeat, declaring his guilt (without a trail) and what he calls “recycled fake news”.  This is his timeline, which the Wall Street Journal has received and which Populist Media has received.

STATEMENT ABOUT ADVANCE NOTICE OF HILLARY EMAILS TO WSJ BY STONE:

” On June 12, 2016, Julian Assange announced to CNN that WikiLeaks had obtained MORE Hillary Clinton email.  In March 2016, WikiLeaks had already posted a searchable database of tens of thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails.  Assange was widely reported to be planning periodic releases of all the information he and his organization had received. My comments reflect what was common knowledge and expectation. It was around this time that Randy Credico told me whatever WikiLeaks had was “big” and would shake up the race and would drop in October. He was correct,” Stone told the Wall Street Journal.

STATEMENT ABOUT GUCCIFER TO WSJ BY STONE:

“I initially believed that Guccifer 2.0 had hacked the DNC because he(?) publicly predicted the e-mails from WikiLeaks. I even wrote a piece for Breitbart saying so. I no longer believe, based on forensic evidence published in the NATION, that the DNC was ever actually hacked at all. The evidence shows that, based on download times, the purloined e-mails were downloaded to a portable storage device and taken out the door. Therefore, I doubt Guccifer 2.0  or anyone else hacked the DNC. I explained this evolution in my thinking, under oath, to the House Intelligence Committee. I have also said it publicly elsewhere.  As for “He actually released them several weeks ago. They got no traction. He took them to Assange. Well, Assange put them out to WikiLeaks.” This was a tip I got from a Guardian reporter. Probably also false.

As to whether Guccifer 2.0  is a Russian, I note this is the claim of the Intelligence Community who claim he (?) left digital fingerprints of its hacks which prove it was a Russian. The WikiLeaks disclosures (Vault 7) show Intelligence Services have the technology to make it appear a hack came from somewhere other than where it came from. I also question why Guccifer 2.0 would be using a software program registered to a DNC staffer. The point is moot. I no longer believe Guccifer 2.0 hacked the DNC. I noted this in my sworn testimony.

Hopefully, in the lawsuit in which I am being sued by the DNC we will finally get discovery to inspect the servers which the FBI was never allowed to inspect to determine if they were hacked at all. My attorneys have asked that they be preserved for discovery.

Please reflect in your reporting that my 24-word exchange with the persona of Guccifer 2.0 took place after the DNC material had already been published so based on timing, context, and the actual content the DM exchange provides no evidence of collusion, collaboration, or coordination. This exchange was gratuitously included in the DOJ indictment of 12 Russian Intelligence Agents although Rod Rosenstein noted at the time “There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime.” As CNBC put it, “Rosenstein also highlighted that Friday’s indictment does not allege that any American knowingly participated in the Russian operation.”

STATEMENT ABOUT SAM NUNBERG CLAIM TO WSJ BY STONE:

“I supplied airline tickets, a hotel receipt, and restaurant receipts to show I was in Los Angles on the very day Sam said I was in London. The Post article misquoted me…After trying for 40 minutes to get Sam Nunberg off the phone on a Friday night, he asked if I had plans for the weekend.”

STATEMENT ABOUT ASSANGE CONNECTION TO WSJ BY STONE

“I never said I had direct communication with Assange and I clarified it was thru a back channel. Just because I dramatized the facts for a partisan audience does not mean I fabricated them. Credico was my confirming source.”

STATEMENT ABOUT CLINTON FOUNDATION TO WSJ BY STONE

The prediction regarding the Clinton Foundation is based on an e-mail as detailed here (click link)

https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/22/roger-stone-WikiLeaks-claim-reporter-email/

This is the so-called second source as reflected in my e-mails. My tip is based on the content of this e-mail which Charles Ortel has confirmed the authenticity of. Ironically it turns out to be wrong.

STATEMENT ABOUT ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE OF PODESTA EMAILS TO WSJ BY STONE

“My tweet [about John Podesta’s time in the barrel] is based on the Aug 14th Breitbart Story that identified Tony Podesta’s work for the same Ukrainian Political Party as Manafort and the extensive report on the Podesta brothers’ lucrative Russian business deals in gas, aluminum, uranium and banking.  All of this was brought to my attention by Jerry Corsi who subsequently sent me a very well researched memo on their dealings that I planned to feed to certain reporters. I was going to be the one parsing out Corsi’s report, I was going to make it their time in the barrel.  I later wrote a piece about their Russian Bank deal.”

FULL STATEMENT TO WSJ BY STONE

“Let’s get it exactly right

“I had no advance knowledge about the acquisition and publication of John Podesta’s e-mail.”

“I had no advance notice of the source content or exact release date of the WikiLeaks DNC disclosures. I received nothing including hacked e-mails from Guccifer 2.0, the Russians, WikiLeaks or anyone else and therefore passed on nothing to Donald Trump and the Trump campaign or anyone else. My testimony in front of the House Committee was accurate and truthful.”

What I am guilty of is using publicly available information and a solid tip to bluff, posture, hype and punk the Democrats on Twitter. This is called Politics. It’s not illegal “

My testimony to the House Intelligence Committee was 100% accurate and truthful despite claims by hyper-partisans who enjoy congressional immunity from lawsuit.

Reread this  https://stonecoldtruth.com/randy-me-truth-about-WikiLeaks/

And to recap

In September I was told by former Congressman Walter Fauntroy that he had brokered an agreement between Quadaffi and the Clinton State Department for Quadaffi to abdicate and gains safe passage out of the country. I was supplied a signed agreement which appeared to be genuine. I noticed an interview in which Assange said he had documents reflecting disagreement over whether to take out Quaddafi. I asked Credico if he knew if they had been posted. Why would I ask Randy if I was in communication with Assange in 2016? His response “ I can’t be asking them for things every day….I’ll ask one of the lawyers.” He provided nothing. You characterize this as “digging dirt”. I call it legitimate political research. Congressman Fauntroy is a credible source and his story detailed.

To be clear Dr. Corsi never told me Podesta’s e-mail had been acquired or gave any e-mails from those eventually published or indicated that he had seen them.  E-Mail and text messages confirm events as outlined above and make no reference to Podesta’s e-mail being acquired.”

END OF STONE STATEMENTS

Remember that Stone has been banned from Twitter and other platforms, so his reach is intentionally reduced in an organized media attack on his reputation.

BEGINNING OF PERSECUTION

and so on and so forth…

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT IF YOU PROMISE TO ROLL OVER THE PRESIDENT

Unless the Media is publishing constant political attacks, dressed up as journalism.   Unless they are given authority to libel your name, brand and reputation.  Back in the old days, Americans had “civil liberties” and the right to a fair court trial.  The American Mainstream Media, including the Wall Street Journal, has pitched that old-fashioned notion.

And American activists and pundits are helpless to stop them.  Unless we are brave enough to make a stand like Stone has done.  

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Lawfare

VIDEO-Roger Stone Says Media Is Recycling “Torrent”of Fake News- Witch Hunt Continues

Published

on

Friday, Populist Media reached out to a longtime friend of President Donald J. Trump to inquire about the latest developments in the subversive leftist media witch hunt, in revenge for his successful activism and journalism

” I have to use this umbrella to protect myself from the torrent of the illegal leaks from the office of Special Council magnified by the fake news ,” said Roger Stone.

Stone calls out MotherJones as “nonsense” for saying his op-eds in favor of Jullian Assange’s pardon were improper. He also denies Jerome Corsi’s claims about advance notice of John Podesta’s email scandal.

We received these video statements from Stone:

 

Stone has been under the scrutiny of Robert Swan Mueller III who is acting as Special Council, investigating if there was Collusion between the Russian State and the 2016 Trump Presidential Campaign.  Stone Is an anticipated target of Mueller’s because of Mueller’s pattern of history getting Americans to tattle on each other so they will not be threatened with undue hardship, themselves.

As highlighted in the Christian Monitor article, hosted now at his site, www.stonecoldtruth.com, the story of Stone and Mueller is vicious lawfare by a man of unlimited taxpayer resources; Mueller, against an American of meager resources; Stone.  All for the crime of being a political opponent.

WITCH HUNT

From the article:

“Roger Stone has spent a lifetime cultivating a reputation as a political street fighter of the first order – a no-holds-barred conservative campaign operative fluent in the dark arts of electoral persuasion and deception.”

“Politics isn’t bean bag. This is a rough-and-tumble game,” Mr. Stone told the Monitor during a wide-ranging, two-hour interview at his home here. “But I’ve never done anything that is outside the norm of what political operatives do.”
Nonetheless, among Democrats, Stone is Lucifer incarnate, a dirty trickster who exploits divisions and stokes fear to gain political advantage for conservative candidates.

In perhaps his most ambitious project, Stone began working as far back as 1988 to convince a flashy, combative New York City real estate developer and eventual reality TV star to run for president of the United States. The rest, as they say, is history.

Except the story isn’t quite over.

Now, Stone, who spent much of his life as a political hit man, finds himself in the crosshairs of special counsel Robert Mueller.

Read More 

GOVERNMENT SPONSORED, TAXPAYER FUNDED LAWFARE AGAINST GRASSROOTS ACTIVISM

Please visit Stone’s legal defense fund… because next time, dear political activist, this could happen to you.

 MAKE A DONATION TO HELP A HERO AND PROTECT A LIBERTY ACTIVIST

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Drain The Swamp

Hillary Loses Again, FBI Not Under Her Control Now,There Will Be No FBI Investigation Into Her Kavanaugh Circus

Published

on

Tuesday, failed Presidential candidate, former First Lady, former Senator, and former Secretary of State, made the Democrat media rounds demanding an FBI investigation into the letter by Christine Blasey Ford making allegations that someone, somewhere once fumbled with her clothing.

Then the accusers spoke out echoing Clinton’s claims:

FBI says no

Typical plot by Democrats led by Hillary Clinton:

Conspiracy to overthrow the President of the United States?

“Weaponized FBI” proponents say:

When they can’t win with that they try public trials on social media to slander an American”

“Elections have consequences” and the answer is still “NO”

We aren’t buying “crazy” anymore Hillary…

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Trending