Connect with us

Crossfire Hurricane

Gates Testimony Against Manafort Turns Into A Circus

Published

on

Tuesday, a lawyer familiar with the Paul Manafort case posted on Twitter his analysis of Rick Gates testimony.

“Reading through the cross-examination of Rick Gates in the Manafort case.. One thing is clear: Gates is lying and the Special Counsel has suborned perjury with their star witness. Haven’t seen a witness with this bad a selective memory in a while. Transcript to follow,” posted Techno Fog.

As reported by the New York Times, “Rick Gates, the former right-hand man to Paul Manafort, President Trump’s campaign chairman, is being cross-examined by defense lawyers in Mr. Manafort’s trial on bank and tax fraud charges in Alexandria, Va.”

“Kevin Downing, the lead defense lawyer, began cross-examination Tuesday by hammering at Mr. Gates’s credibility, demanding an exact accounting of when he lied to the government and pleaded guilty to the charge of doing so. Mr. Gates seemed to struggle to articulate that timeline, prompting Judge T. S. Ellis III to intervene,” they said.

Full Article 

The poster who goes by the name “Techno Fog” identified himself to Populist Media as a Lawyer from New York.  He needs to protect his identity. The following is his analysis of the Cross Examination from Tuesday.

MANUFACTURED BY THE SPECIAL COUNSEL

GATES GOT A PLEA DEAL

GATES’ CRIMES OUTLINED

HOW GATES COMMITTED CRIMES

JUDGE ELLIS ANNOYED- MADE GOVERNMENT CRY

SPECIAL COUNSEL GETS SPANKED AGAIN

INSTRUCTS JURRY- SPECIAL COUNSEL IS DEALING IN “BS”

 

JUDGE TELLS SPECIAL COUNSEL THEY WILL LOSE

GATES LIED

THE CIRCUS IS IN TOWN

WHO TO BELIEVE?

You can follow Techno Fog’s posts on Twitter: HERE

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Crossfire Hurricane

Excellent Interview: Roger Stone Under Mueller’s Microscope Tells Patrick Slevin He May Get Framed

Published

on

Monday, Roger Stone, longtime friend and former advisor to President Donald J. Trump, was interviewed by influencer Patrick Slevin.  The two talked about Stone’s experience with Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation into the historic Trump victory.

Stone, a highly successful political strategist is being harassed with lawfare and bullied by the full weight of the federal legal system, at Mueller’s disposal, for the misdeeds of advising Trump how to run for President as a Republican and win with Americans.

And Trump did win. And Stone was right again.

From the Interview:

Q. I noticed that the UK Daily Mail said you were “fretting” an indictment by the special counsel.

A. Roger Stone said: I have said that I am concerned of being framed and railroaded by the Special Counsel.  While I am certain Mr. Mueller would like to charge me with Russian collusion or collaboration with Wikileaks that he claims is illegal, there is no evidence or witness that could prove these charges truthfully.  That said, Mueller and his boys could concoct some other charge to pressure me to testify against the President. I could see them bring some process charge against me. It would be pretty transparent. They are amazingly obtuse about their own acts of misconduct in a corrupted process. It would set off a chain of events they may regret.

Q.  The personal and financial strain of this investigation of you must be draining.  How are you doing?

A.  I have been sued and won a defamation case.  I was sued by an Obama directed legal front group making the same discredited claims that I received allegedly hacked DNC emails from Wikileaks and passed it on to Donald Trump and that lawsuit was dismissed.  I now face a lawsuit from the DNC based on the same false claim.  Even though there are a dozen other defendants in that lawsuit, only my lawyers have asked for preservation of the DNC computer servers which have never been examined by the FBI.  An examination of which could prove once and for all whether the DNC was hacked at all or whether the purloined data was more likely downloaded to some sort of portable drive and taken out the back door.  Additionally, my lawyers are sparring with the Senate Intelligence Committee over their refusal to allow me to testify in public and a ridiculously broad document demand under which I would have to hand over literally hundreds of thousands of documents and emails.  I also have Robert Mueller and his gumshoes boring into every aspect of my family, business, social, personal and political life.  My legal fees are well over half a million dollars and are projected to cost as much as two million dollars before this witch-hunt is over.  In truth, I face bankruptcy and financial ruin for my family.

Q.  The personal and financial strain of this investigation of you must be draining.  How are you doing?

A.  I have been sued and won a defamation case.  I was sued by an Obama directed legal front group making the same discredited claims that I received allegedly hacked DNC emails from Wikileaks and passed it on to Donald Trump and that lawsuit was dismissed.  I now face a lawsuit from the DNC based on the same false claim.  Even though there are a dozen other defendants in that lawsuit, only my lawyers have asked for preservation of the DNC computer servers which have never been examined by the FBI.  An examination of which could prove once and for all whether the DNC was hacked at all or whether the purloined data was more likely downloaded to some sort of portable drive and taken out the back door.  Additionally, my lawyers are sparring with the Senate Intelligence Committee over their refusal to allow me to testify in public and a ridiculously broad document demand under which I would have to hand over literally hundreds of thousands of documents and emails.  I also have Robert Mueller and his gumshoes boring into every aspect of my family, business, social, personal and political life.  My legal fees are well over half a million dollars and are projected to cost as much as two million dollars before this witch-hunt is over.  In truth, I face bankruptcy and financial ruin for my family.

Q.  But I read a story online that said you are worth 20 million dollars.

A.  That is laughable.  I assume that story was planted in order to dampen my legal defense fundraising efforts.  I am not a wealthy man.  I own no stocks, bonds, or real estate.  My suits, while of outstanding quality, are in most cases 20 years old.  The five books I have written have been modestly successful with my first book “The Man Who Killed Kennedy-The Case Against L.B.J.” becoming a New York Times bestseller.  Unfortunately, I have been forced to liquidate a small fund generated by book sale proceeds to pay for the college education of my grandchildren.  People who want to help can donate at Stonedefensefund.com.

Read More

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Crossfire Hurricane

Revenge On Roger Stone Continues: Collusion Isn’t A Crime But Conspiracy Is

Published

on

Thursday, a long time friend of President Donald J. Trump was interviewed about his experiences with the Democrat’s “Russian Collusion” conspiracies, which dominate their ability to accept the results of the 2016 Presidential race, and isolate them from celebrating historic improvements for the American people.

“Wikileaks did have a devastating effect on the Clinton campaign.  Now Democrats hate Wikileaks, they loved them once.  I never received any hacked emails,” said Roger Jason Stone, Jr., champion of President Donald J. Trump.

FULL INTERVIEW LISTEN HERE

Variety reported on the interview:

Stone said, “should it come to it, I can prove that I never had any direct contact with Julian Assange in 2016 and I never received any allegedly hacked emails.”

“I think it is possible that I will be framed, but I have no idea,” he added. “It is very clear how the system works. You find a low-level person who has done something wrong, and then you squeeze them to bear false witness against a bigger fish.”

He said he had “serious questions about the constitutional authority of Mr. Mueller.”

“I also have problems with a number of these prosecutors in terms of their personal bias or the nature of their appointment, and those questions will all get raised at an appropriate time if they are foolish enough to bringing an action against me,” he said. “I have no intention of just bending over. That I can assure you.”

Read More

“BOBBY THREE STICKS”

As Populist Media reported, Stone is correct about the well-known tactics of Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III. We interviewed a DC lawyer who told us the legal foundation for Mueller to work in such a way.

BOTTOM OF THE FOOD CHAIN:

David Benowitz ,  speaking about the cornerstone of Mueller’s case, George Papadopoulos, is a  White-Collar Criminal Lawyer in DC, who said most interesting to him was that the Papadopoulos incitement was under seal and he had a cooperation agreement.

“It will be interesting to see what comes out about what he did when he was under seal, he may have been wearing a wire. There is a lot more to come out, “ Benowitz said.

“You give up a lot of rights when you plead guilty,” Benowitz said, signaling that he expected some juicy things to come out.

Benowitz told Populist Wire about the provision of the law Part 5k-Departures which gives substantial assistance to authorities, that is most important in Federal criminal cases.  “If you cooperate with the prosecutor he or she can ask the judge for a lesser sentence.

“Sentencing guidelines show the prosecutor has enormous power.  And Papadopoulos wanted to cooperate because he can plea down to probation. He has done well for himself with his cooperation agreement. He pled to one of the lowest charges,” said Benowitz

Benowitz expects to see some major charges soon, perhaps even the crime of Treason, coming out of these indictments.

“In the Thick book that talks about and describes crimes and enhancements there are guidelines like if you are using sophisticated means of influencing more than 5 people,  you have a higher sentence. That could be Treason in this case, which is a crime.  There is no crime called Collusion,” he said.

Papadopoulos isn’t a major player in the administration. “It’s the little guy who knows a lot , who they go after” Benowitz said.

TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN:

STONE THE TARGET, WARFARE IN 2018:

What they can’t frame him with using Lawfare they will make into a movie, mostly likely to pressure Stone to “Roll” or “Flip” on Trump.  Surely someone who has known Trump for over 40 years has some information that political opponents would like to know.

Who needs a judicial system or a representative Republic when Hollywood- cum- revenge politics is a tool to shape public opinion?

The Democrats plan to impeach Trump on the pressure they create with subversive propaganda, that they use to shape public opinion.

CULTURAL MARXISM IS THIS

When all else fails for the Communist-Democrats they design and make the needed subversive propaganda.  Their Marxist tactics teach that the left demands control of the common culture narrative, the institutions and public opinion.

Where the media and the Democrat party have failed to make their case for overthrowing the victory of the American people with Trump, a filmmaker has stepped in. Enter : said Subversive Marxist- Propaganda meant to overthrow a duly elected sitting president.

WATCH:

WAS RUSSIAN COLLUSION ALL A SET UP? LEVERAGE? AN INSURANCE POLICY?

Collusion is not a crime, but conspiracy is.

“I assume the movie is fiction, it claims Russian collusion. It has been established there was some Russian collusion.  That was all over the place- with Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton and Trump campaigns.  The Russians were trying to sow discord, but that is not Russian collusion with the Trump campaign,” Stone said in the interview.

“I was not interviewed for the film.  Objective journalists ask your opinions, I would have met with this (filmmaker) but I never heard from him,” said Stone.

INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENTING STONE

That is convenient for subversive agents. The filmmaker does not investigate or cite Stone’s sworn testimony about the statement highlighted in the film, they just lead their audience with a clip.

The Washington Post reported on Stone’s sworn testimony, from Stone’s own written report.

BACK TO THE INTERVIEW

Variety reported:

“A clip of Stone is featured in the new documentary “Active Measures,” in a scene from August 2016, in which he tells the Broward Republican Organization that he had “communicated with Assange.”

Stone was not interviewed for the documentary but said what he meant by the remark was that he had an intermediary.

“I was told by the New York radio personality Randy Credico, when Assange went on CNN in June of 2016, and said that he had a treasure trove of documents on Hillary Clinton and that he would release them,” Stone said.

“Now Mr. Credico never told me the source of those documents and the content of them, only that they existed and would roil the presidential race, and they did,” Stone said.

Credico, who has been an advocate for Assange, spoke to the Mueller grand jury last week, and told MSNBC, “most of the questions were about Roger Stone.” He said Assange came up “peripherally.” He declined to get into specifics of what was the subject matter of the questions about Stone,” Variety reported.

ACCUSED: BUT… STONE MET ASSANGE

“I never had any direct contact with Jullian Assange.  The filmmaker makes another error. There is no proof that Julian Assange is an agent of Russia. Assange is a journalist, he got information from a whistleblower and printed it,” Stone said.

“The Democrats loved Wikileaks when they were exposing President Bush,” Stone said.

ACCUSED:  BUT.. STONE ODDLY PREDICTED PODESTA EXPOSE’

“The Podestas’ time in the barrel will come.” Stone posted on Twitter, which the Democrats have morphed to mean he knew about the future Podesta’s email scandal.

However, who didn’t know about Podestas’ dramas?

Flashback…

 

 

MEDIA INQUIRY LOOKS LIKE THIS:

It was ever thus…

Still, in 2018, Developing…

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Crossfire Hurricane

Mark Meadows: “We Have The Names Of Reporters Who Leaked”

Published

on

Wednesday, two congressmen leading the way to expose the “Deep State” involvement to frame President Donald J. Trump were on the Sean Hannity Show on Fox News uncovering new texts between FBI agents.

There were multiple reporters who were spinning tales about our President, they are denying it, but we have the proof.  We want the American people to see it.  We need to release these documents,” said Rep. Mark Meadows (R-North Carolina).

“They believed that the more people who see and hear the lie, the more people will believe it.  Which is why they had so many outlets reporting it.  The Dossier was a big lie.  The 302s show a pattern of lying to the courts.  I want to know what was in those reports,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio).

“We know that those reporters knew that they were reporting leaks.  We have their names,” Meadows said.

“They didn’t tell them who paid for the dossier [Hillary Clinton and the DNC]. Didn’t tell them that the guy who wrote it, Christopher Steele, had an extreme bias against the president, and said he was desperate to stop Trump. And they didn’t tell the court about Bruce and Nellie Ohr’s involvement in the production of the document. If you and I go to a court, we’ve got to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” said Jordan.

WATCH:

MEDIA LEAK STRATEGY

ROSENSTEIN KNOWS:

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Please follow and like us:
Continue Reading

Trending